>ARF report streams MUST be established proactively between Report >Generators and Mailbox Providers. Recommendations for preparing to make >that request are discussed in Section 4.1 of <xref target="RFC6449"/>.
I don't see why 2119 language is appropriate here. This is basically a definition -- a solicited stream is one where there's an agreement, an unsolicited stream where there isn't. It's possible to interoperate either way. >> > 6.2.1 >> > Handling of unsolicited reports has a significant cost to the >> > receiver. Senders of unsolicited reports, especially those >> > sending large volumes of them automatically, need to be aware of >> > this and do all they reasonably can to avoid sending reports that >> > cannot be used as a basis for action by the recipient, whether >> > this is due to the report being sent about an incident that is >> > not abuse-related, the report being sent to an email address that >> > won't result in action, or the content or format of the report >> > being hard for the recipient to read or use. >> > >> > I don't get why 2119 language is being avoided in the above. Why not >> > s/need to be aware of this and do all they reasonably can to avoid >> > sending/[MUST/SHOULD] NOT send ? On the other hand I do think that 2119 is appropriate here. Senders of unsolicited reports SHOULD avoid gratuitously annoying people, and MUST stop bothering people who've told them to stop. If they don't, recipients are likely to stop accepting reports which would mean they don't interoperate. R's, John _______________________________________________ marf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf
