>The diff: http://www.blackops.org/~msk/marf-as.html
Looks fine to me. If I were picking nits I'd suggest that the sentence about RFC6449 say: Further introduction to this topic may be found in [RFC6449], which is effectively an Applicability Statement written outside of the IETF and so it is unknown whether it would represent IETF consensus. But it's fine as is. R's, John _______________________________________________ marf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf
