Alexi1952 <alexi1...@yandex.ru> writes:
> Agree. BTW tables_ok() is just the only member I had already #ifdef'ed out
> from Rpl_filter for client context.
Ah, I see.
> As for your suggestion to have a separate class, is it OK to do something
> like this?
>
> class Binlog_filter
> {
> < ... all members from Rpl_filter except for tables_ok()
> ... (will also check carefully for other members) ...>
> };
>
> class Rpl_filter: public Binlog_filter
> {
> <... tables_ok() ...>
> };
Yes, that sounds good.
>
> BTW in this case declaring
>
> Binlog_filter* binlog_filter;
>
> will look like more natural than
>
> Rpl_filter* binlog_filter;
>
> (why indeed *replication filter* in mysqlbinlog which actully *doesn't
> replicate* :)
Indeed :-)
Thanks,
- Kristian.
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~maria-developers
Post to : maria-developers@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~maria-developers
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
