Hi, Alexey! On Jan 11, Alexey Botchkov wrote: > But now i think it can be useful to perform the NOOP ALTER possible > faster.
Agree. But I suppose it's easy. We're trying already to optimize certain cases of ALTER TABLE to avoid copying the data. Like, changing certain table attributes (comments, may be?). Taking into account a completely no-op ALTER fit in well there. > Otherwise i'm working now to reform the mysql_alter_table() so we can > do the IF EXISTS checks in the same places where we return the errors > about (not yet) existing objects. It seems working, but the > modification is going to be significant. Are we ok with big changes in > this part of code? If you say "it seems working", it means you have a (probably incomplete) patch already. Could you send it to me, please, so that I could see how big it is and what it is changing? Regards, Sergei _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~maria-developers Post to : maria-developers@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~maria-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
