On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 8:51 PM, Kristian Nielsen <kniel...@knielsen-hq.org> wrote: >> yet). But from time to time we see failures of rpl.rpl_gtid_crash test >> with the output like this: > > Hm, strange, it does not fail in our Buildbot, which runs hundreds of tests on > different hosts...
Well, either our build environment differs, or we induced something with our patches... >> that. It's possible that there's something wrong with us applying GTID >> patch on top of 10.0.1 and maybe I'm missing something crucial (we > >> off the top of your head what changes were done since 10.0.1 that are >> required for crash recovery to work properly? > > I am wondering if you mean 10.0.2 here? (Since GTID was not included in > 10.0.1, only 10.0.2). No, I meant 10.0.1 -- we took it and applied all that you did in 10.0-mdev26 and then in 10.0-base, but only GTID-related patches and patches fixing flakiness of tests... > There was a change to rpl.rpl_gtid_crash.test to use --append_file instead of > --remove_file/--write_file. Though these failures look like something else... We already have the --append_file change. > I can't think of anything else right now, but if you send the files then there > is a good chance I can say more. OK. I'll try to catch log files next time this happens. Pavel _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~maria-developers Post to : maria-developers@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~maria-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp