Sujatha, howdy. Thank you for spelling it out for me!
> Hello Andrei, ... >>> >>> Analysis: >>> ========= >>> Enabling "replicate_annotate_row_events" on slave, Tells the slave to write >>> annotate rows events received from the master to its own binary log. The >>> received annotate events are applied after the Gtid event as shown below. >>> thd->query() will be set to the actual query received from the master, >>> through >>> annotate event. Annotate_rows event should not be deleted after the event is >>> applied as the thd->query will be used to generate new Annotate_rows event >>> during applying the subsequent Rows events. >> [ here ] >> The Table_map and Rows_log_event that follow do not touch thd->query(). > > The Table_map and Rows_log_event that follow "Annotate_rows" event do > make use of "thd->query()". Frankly I did not expect that. Perhaps it would have not been a bad idea to make Annotate_rows_log_event::do_apply_event() logging of itself, which still makes sense even if the slave applier will filter out its group's Rows_log_event:s so in this case the slave side event group would consists of mere Annotate. The above is a mere remark though, I have to accept what we have. >> >> I also suggest to check out mysqlbinlog run. There seems to be no test >> for that though, so one needs to be written. The goal would be to prove >> a created binlog output is as expected (e.g to include Annotate). > > > Sure, I will add a test case. Super! The patch is approved then. Cheers, Andrei _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~maria-developers Post to : maria-developers@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~maria-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
