...we are about as off-topic as we would be if we started talking about the world cup...
at 13:45 on 08.07.2006, Jan Erik Moströ m wrote: >Reply to Mark Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 06-07-08 12:33: > >> FW*L*IW, I think its a matter of personal filtering >> policy. If you discretely filter markdown discuss >> messages, then all you need is in the headers. If you have >> a common filter for markdown-discuss messages and one, or >> more other message sources, then a secondary sort criteria >> for the mailbox, label, or whatever can be useful. This is >> where I see *some* value in "subject IDs". [Case in point >> : the 3 "BBEdit lists" (talk, scripting and web-dev)] > >I usually do this by having one BBSW talk filter > > if any recipient contains "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" then deposit > >and then sub-filters for the various lists > > if any recipient contains "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > then deposit Yes. I do something similar and we both use the same email client, though I think your version might be newer than mine (: My point was though, that one might not want a one list per mailbox, or one list per label/tag filtering model and in such cases the possibility of sorting the message list per list/label/tag becomes interesting again. Was just mentioning an area in which the subject annotation could be used in a way that (in most clients) is not facilitated by header contents. I'd prefer to do this with lables than with subject annotations, but sometimes there aint enough labels to go round. mark. _______________________________________________ Markdown-Discuss mailing list [email protected] http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/markdown-discuss
