* Michel Fortin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-09-13 04:20]:
> (Assuming you meant `&lt;tag>`, or  `&lt;tag&gt;`.)

Yes, that’s what I meant.

* John Gruber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-09-13 06:35]:
> Yeah, either way you're "escaping" it, and `\<` is easier and
> prettier than `&lt;`.

No doubt. Just saying it’s alreadz possible.

Regards,
-- 
Aristotle Pagaltzis // <http://plasmasturm.org/>
_______________________________________________
Markdown-Discuss mailing list
Markdown-Discuss@six.pairlist.net
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/markdown-discuss

Reply via email to