On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 10:14 PM, Aristotle Pagaltzis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Any inferred nesting would have to subordinate them to an implied
> 3rd item in the surrounding unordered list that is not written
> out in these examples – semantically equivalent roughly to this:
>
> - foo
> - bar
> -
> 1. baz
> 1. quux
> - qux
>
Not necessarily. Take the following example (with 4 spaces before item "two"):
- one
2. two
With the exception of Maruku (which falls flat on it's face here),
every implementation consistently renders this:
<ul>
<li>one <ol>
<li>two</li>
</ol>
</li>
</ul>
While I hate to deflate any argument against option B, the fact is,
there doesn't have to be any "implied 3rd item in the surrounding
unordered list". However, without the indentation, I don't think it's
clear to the casual reader that that should be a nested ordered list -
which I've already discussed in my previous comment.
--
----
Waylan Limberg
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Markdown-Discuss mailing list
Markdown-Discuss@six.pairlist.net
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/markdown-discuss
