Waylan Limberg wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 11:36 AM, Jason Blevins
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I couldn't find any discussion of it on the list, but here's the
> > changelog entry:
> >
> > 1.0.2b2 - 20 Mar 2005
> >
> >    +   Experimental support for [this] as a synonym for [this][].
> 
> Interestingly, this a completely different use for single-bracketed
> text than I use and see on a daily basis. As I mentioned before, I see
> it more as a shortcut footnote type syntax for links only when text is
> expected to be read in plain text format.

Thats a good point--I wasn't making the distinction before.  Using
numbers in brackets like so [1] is definitely a common notation for
footnotes.  I use it myself in emails but I didn't make the connection.
It's also common for math and engineering journals to use that notation
for references.

Interestingly, that's how peg-markdown (with extensions via -x) renders
footnotes.  Instead of the link being a superscript '1', you get '[1]'.
I actually like that better for the web I think.  Superscripts are nice
in print, but there you don't have to click on them.

-- 
Jason Blevins
Ph.D. Candidate, Department of Economics, Duke University
http://jblevins.org/
_______________________________________________
Markdown-Discuss mailing list
Markdown-Discuss@six.pairlist.net
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/markdown-discuss

Reply via email to