Hello. Not having tried to use MultiMarkdown for comments, but knowing that they work for including raw latex, I can't see why they shouldn't work for html as comments.
I ran this test: ---- MMD document: ## comment test html <!-- Man I really need some deep thoughts about this --> To comment or not comment is a question about reflection. -- Resulting html: <h2 id="commenttesthtml">comment test html</h2> <!-- Man I really need some deep thoughts about this --> <p>To comment or not comment is a question about reflection.</p> hth Tommy Den 5. mai 2011 kl. 03.03 skrev bucephalus org: > Hi there! > > (1.) > > It may sound awkward, but I would like to use comments in Markdown texts. > According to the rule that proper HTML works as HTML, I should be able to > use > > <!-- blablabla --> > > But the converters I use do strange things with comments. Is there an > official rule about that? > > > (2.) > > I wonder if there is a recommended standard file extension for Markdown > source files. > For my own files I always use `.markdown`. > But other important sources seem to prefer `.text`. > > Do you have an opinion on that, or is there even a standard? > _______________________________________________ > Markdown-Discuss mailing list > Markdown-Discuss@six.pairlist.net > http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/markdown-discuss Best regards Tommy Bollman -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mollison's Bureaucracy Hypothesis: If an idea can survive a bureaucratic review and be implemented it wasn't worth doing. _______________________________________________ Markdown-Discuss mailing list Markdown-Discuss@six.pairlist.net http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/markdown-discuss
