Three people on markdown-discuss in agreement? Must be a new record. :) Thanks for weighing in, Waylan.
David On 5 June 2011 18:57, Waylan Limberg <way...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 8:35 PM, David Chambers > <david.chambers...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Michel Fortin <michel.for...@michelf.com> wrote: > >> > >> I'd tend to go for something even simpler: > >> > >> Some text 30 May 2011 more text. > >> > >> > >> > >> *[30 May 2011]: 2011-05-30 15:00 -07:00 > >> > >> Basically, why do we need to force brackets in the text at all? Also, > why > >> force the writer to use 'T' as a time separator and strictly follow to > the > >> rules of HTML date syntax? It's much more readable without the 'T'. > >> Reformatting it to HTML's liking should be pretty trivial. > > > > I love this idea. I'm unfamiliar with PHP Markdown Extra's abbreviation > > syntax (I'll read up on it); building upon an established convention > sounds > > very sensible to me. > > I'll have to say I like this as well. It hadn't occurred to me that > like the abbreviation syntax, we don't need to mark up the text at > all. > > Regarding the time v. datetime, I picked datetime because that is the > name of the html attribute the same value would be assigned to. But > time is certainly shorter. Maybe you won't need either as Michel > suggests. > > -- > ---- > \X/ /-\ `/ |_ /-\ |\| > Waylan Limberg > _______________________________________________ > Markdown-Discuss mailing list > Markdown-Discuss@six.pairlist.net > http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/markdown-discuss >
_______________________________________________ Markdown-Discuss mailing list Markdown-Discuss@six.pairlist.net http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/markdown-discuss
