+++ Andrew Pennebaker [Oct 18 12 09:52 ]: > What I'm saying here is that relying on 3rd parties solutions while a > very cheap (or even free) VPS would be sufficient is asking for > unnecessary trouble. > > I agree that we should opt for convenient, preferably free hosting. > I don't mean to start a technical argument about "static" vs "dynamic" > web pages. What I'm trying to convey is that GitHub, while an > incredibly easy CMS, only supports static web pages, not wikis, which > require a running system that can modify a database for wiki edits.
Github has wikis for each project. Example: https://github.com/jgm/pandoc/wiki You'd only have to create a 'markdown' project, which needn't have anything in it but a README.markdown file with a link to the wiki. Anyone with a github account could edit the wiki. This seems far easier than any of the other proposals. _______________________________________________ Markdown-Discuss mailing list Markdown-Discuss@six.pairlist.net http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/markdown-discuss
