People still care about XHTML validation? HTML5 has done a much better job of unifying behavior across clients and tools everywhere.
But maybe I misunderstand your point. Alan > On Mar 5, 2014, at 9:19 AM, Jak Wings <jakwi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Good idea. I have never thought of it. But it is a new element of HTML5, I > have a little worry about it. I am not able provide a XHTML mode for it. > > Best regards, > Jak Wings > >> On 3/5/14, 11:19 AM, Fletcher T. Penney wrote: >> >> Do you mean inline images vs <figure>'s? >> >> In MultiMarkdown, I started with no changes to Markdown's image >> approach, but eventually added a feature that an image by itself as a >> paragraph would be a <figure> rather than an inline image type. >> >> I have not surveyed users to see which is used more commonly, but I do >> get a fair number of questions related to <figures>, and very few >> related to inline images. >> >> >> Fletcher >> >> >>> On 3/5/14, 10:18 AM, Jak Wings wrote: >>> I’m designing my own Markdown-like language. :) I just don’t know how >>> important it is to use inline images. What do you think? >>> >>> Best regards, >>> Jak Wings >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Markdown-Discuss mailing list >>> Markdown-Discuss@six.pairlist.net >>> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/markdown-discuss >> >> -- >> Fletcher T. Penney >> fletc...@fletcherpenney.net >> _______________________________________________ >> Markdown-Discuss mailing list >> Markdown-Discuss@six.pairlist.net >> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/markdown-discuss > > _______________________________________________ > Markdown-Discuss mailing list > Markdown-Discuss@six.pairlist.net > http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/markdown-discuss _______________________________________________ Markdown-Discuss mailing list Markdown-Discuss@six.pairlist.net http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/markdown-discuss
