On Tue, 2006-08-08 at 04:15 +1000, Jeff Waugh wrote: > "Software Map" is not the right way to approach these problems, and it's not > the right way to get things our users care about on the page.
Fair enough, I'll back my stubborn ass off the case :) To summarize: - Our focus now is to present the Gnome desktop in the context of higher level products, with emphasis on benefits and features. - We are going ahead with a software map as outlined in [1], which will basically just be a list of endorsed applications (or whatever we are calling it now). We are still going ahead with it, right? > > > That's a very simple Apache configuration change. We need not be > > > concerned about this (or breaking the existing wgo/projects URLs) at > > > all. > > > > It's not just about that. It will look and feel different, just not > > integrated. > > That's fine. We're running to a highly compressed schedule. We can make the > template look reasonably similar. We Have The Technology. All right then. All the other things discussed are now basically a non-issue. I'm sorry for wasting your times, though I hope it made things clearer for others too. Looking forward to real progress :) Greg [1] http://live.gnome.org/GnomeWeb/SoftwareMap -- marketing-list mailing list marketing-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing-list