Vikram:
My name is Vikram Vaswani and I work with Initmarketing, the open
source marketing agency (www.initmarketing.com
<http://www.initmarketing.com>). We've been working with the GNOME
Foundation for the last few weeks to build a set of modular slide
decks for community members to use when making presentations.
These look great. I understand these were provided as consulting work
for The GNOME Foundation. Note that the GNOME Foundation did recently
announce an interest in receiving bids for doing additional GNOME
Marketing related work, perhaps with more of a focus on GNOME 3.
Overall looks really good. Some comments I have...
Template:
- The "GNOMETemplate" file downloads as a binary blob without an
OpenOffice extension, as just "GNOMETemplate" instead of
"GNOMETemplate.odp" or whatever the suffix should be.
- Considering GNOME 3 is a big release, maybe a "Try out GNOME 3"
slide to encourage users about the new release would be something
useful to include.
- Should the "Sponsored By GNOME" page also include a link to
http://live.gnome.org/CodeOfConduct/SpeakerGuidelines?
- It might be good to encourage people to license their presentations
showing how to do so with a good free license such as CC-BY-SA 3.0
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
Can these templates be released under a good license like this?
A license could go near the beginning of a slideset after the
title page or at the end, I'd think. It could just include the
CC license logo and a sentence highlighting that the presentation
is released under this license.
Accessibility:
- I think that this slide deck lacks good use of branding the GNOME
logo to the accessibility project. Only the term "GNOME" is used
on the slide title. This slide does does do a good job of listing
out the various GNOME accessibility programs. Perhaps using the
GNOME logo on these pages to clearly highlight that these are
programs in the "GNOME" accessibility suite would help. Also,
perhaps a page declaring and defining what "GNOME" Accessibility
means specifically. Now that KDE is adopting the "GNOME"
Accessibility infrastructure, it is perhaps a bit confusing what
parts of A11Y are GNOME cross-desktop and which are not. This
slide deck could discuss what "cross desktop" means a bit more.
I think this page has a cool GNOME branded a11y logo that would
be nice to include in this slide deck, I think. Perhaps removing
the "Outreach Program:" text from the top or just using it in ways
that relate to "reaching out".
http://projects.gnome.org/outreach/a11y/
- The Accessibility slide deck says "The GNOME Accessibility project
develops and fosters compelling free open source accessibility
solutions for graphical user interfaces."
The term "graphical" should probably be removed. The accessibility
project also supports tactile user interfaces (e.g. braille displays).
Or perhaps this could be reworded to highlight that a11y interfaces
do not always relate to graphics.
Slide 3 says "Winner of numerous rewards". Which ones?
Slide 4 says "Available to other desktops". I understand what you
mean, but I'd think this could be explained a bit more clearly to
avoid confusion. Which desktops? Available how?
Slide 6 says "Mouse tweaks" which is an application while the
other bullets are all general categories. Might be better to
explain what "Mouse tweaks" does rather than its name.
Slides 7-12 could use a bit more description. What does "Mouse
only access" mean? What is a "Screen reader"? Why does "Head
Movement" relate to accessibility? seems the sorts of questions
I'd expect people to have seeing these slides.
Accessibility is very much a humanitarian project. A slide
showing a photo of someone who benefits from GNOME accessibility
with a quote or something would be a nice way to add a bit
more humans into the slideset.
- The resources page should contain a link to a top-level a11y
page like http://projects.gnome.org/accessibility. Perhaps
users can figure out there are screencasts there without
needing to provide the most specific link.
- The Accessibility slide deck doesn't have any page asking
people to become Friends of GNOME. Considering that accessibility
probably has unique opportunities for seeking donations to help
the disabled, it might be useful to have a slide that reaches out
to people to donate to improve free software a11y tools.
Applications
- It is important to many people that GNOME interoperate with some
popular non-GNOME programs such as Firefox, Thunderbird, GIMP,
OpenOffice, Flash, KDE applications, etc. Some of the organizations
providing these programs are a part of The GNOME Foundation and
community, so it would be nice to highlight this relationship. A
page that discusses how well GNOME integrates with such popular
programs would be nice, perhaps with a caveat that support does vary
between distros.
- I think PDF support is an important feature to many people, so
evince might be nice to discuss.
- It might be cool to highlight that GNOME media programs make
use of the GStreamer engine which supports plugins for popular
non-free media formats (such as MPEG, Windows Media, etc.) via
vendors like Fluendo. Then it could be made more clear that codec
supports works well across all GNOME media programs.
- Why only discuss audio media programs? Perhaps a videoconferencing
program like ekiga would be good to highlight more.
- GNOME does have an "Office" suite. Should we highlight
this better, or perhaps organize those "Office" programs this
slide already talks about so they are more clearly branded as
"GNOME Office"?
http://live.gnome.org/GnomeOffice
- I like how the programs graphics are used. Why not use graphics
where programs are discussed in the "Accessibility" slide?
Developers:
- I do not like the use of the term "Rule". A lot of them do not
really seem like rules. "Examples are good!" or "Learn from
documentation" are not really rules. These seem more like Guides or
Best Practices.
- Would it be good to highlight the process for how a module can be
accepted into GNOME? Perhaps a mention that it must meet certain
requirements such as a reasonable plan for accessibility support.
- Should we highlight some general information about how GNOME manages
licensing? What licenses are normally used by GNOME, whether we
require copyright assignment, perhaps an opportunity to highlight
the benefits of being a free software project a bit more specifically.
- Additional resources to consider adding:
http://developer.gnome.org
http://live.gnome.org
where to find developers on IRC,
the "Getting Started" web page http://www.gnome.org/start, etc.
Contributing
- On the Marketing tab, could we use the "Spread the word" image
instead of the text which is conveniently also green.
http://live.gnome.org/GnomeMarketing
- Perhaps a Resources page like in the "Developers" slide deck would
be useful to have here also.
--
marketing-list mailing list
marketing-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing-list
