Hello Olav, Ahato, Tobias! Olav: I know that you cannot export your data from Google's services, and that was always an issue with Google. However I can't see how a service that hosts thousands open projects will change.
Ahato: Yes, is about interface and about the Google Effect. Tobias: Please don't go to "satisfied" issue. If I wasn't I wouldn't be here. But none will ever be satisfied completely with nothing :) Many people that believe in free or open source use Google Services, or Facebook or YouTube or whatever. Gnome uses Twitter etc. Many free projects use Google Groups. I believe that Open Source should be in harmony with proprietary. The goal is to develop open source not to disqualified proprietary. As I said I might saying stupid things, I am okay with the answers :) Consider this topic closed! Thank you! - alex On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 3:16 PM, Tobias Mueller <tobias...@gnome.org> wrote: > Hello, > > On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 02:51:27PM +0300, alex diavatis wrote: > > Moving from MLs to Google Groups will get nothing but advantages. > > > Are you not satisfied with any particular aspect? > > > *Sharing and Discovering* > > Open Source is about sharing. Sharing isn't working good in hardly > > discovered MLs. > [citation needed] > Right now, I can download the mboxes, index, search and share all *I* > want. > > > I am also saying this because of the close source Google platform. Is > > better to use a close platform and be more "open source" rather to > > use an open platform and be less "open source". > > > I disagree with you. Strongly. We not only want to be "open", but also > "free". That is, to be in control over what happens to our > infrastructure and who controls who is using it. > > Cheers, > Tobi >
-- marketing-list mailing list marketing-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing-list
