Hello Sri, Brett,

Calling trash an article (doesn't matter if it is or isn't) will lead to
negative critics back to you.
Instead I propose to make each month (or every 2 or 3) a "positive" press
release about the future of gnome, what happened in the past month,
what decisions are made etc etc and always discuss
the controversial features and say yes we know there are problems, but etc
etc

I would like to see a press release like (
http://afaikblog.wordpress.com/2012/08/07/gnome-os/) to coming signed by
the Gnome Team or
Gnome Foundation, or Gnome People instead just from a single developer.

That would be posted in all major blogs, and so people will get positive
feedback about Gnome. There are many other pros such as a better
communication
between users and foundation and that you show that you care. This is what
they do big game authors. It works great.

I really would like to see such thing from Gnome. Every Month, or Two :)

Thank you
- alex



On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Brett Legree <brett.leg...@gmail.com>wrote:

> Agreed - that article was complete and utter sensationalistic garbage.
>
> GNOME 3 doesn't seem to be "failing" on my desktop.
>
> -Brett
>
> On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 10:54 PM, Sriram Ramkrishna <s...@ramkrishna.me>
> wrote:
> > We really need to push back on negative articles like this one:
> >
> >
> http://www.datamation.com/open-source/gnome-seven-possible-recovery-strategies-3.html
> >
> > "conventional wisdom is that GNOME 3 has failed"
> >
> > seriously.  What the hell.
> >
> > sri
> >
> > --
> > marketing-list mailing list
> > marketing-list@gnome.org
> > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing-list
> >
> --
> marketing-list mailing list
> marketing-list@gnome.org
> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing-list
>
-- 
marketing-list mailing list
marketing-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing-list

Reply via email to