On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 10:33 AM, Andreas Nilsson <li...@andreasn.se> wrote: > On 09/03/2012 01:43 PM, Olav Vitters wrote: >> >> IMO I'd rather ignore that a component like gnome-shell exists when >> writing the user documentation bits. >> >> I'd rather talk about concepts and skip the implementation details, >> meaning having categories such as: >> - Lock Screen >> - Overview Mode >> - Top Panel (or whatever the thing is called) >> - more usage of app menu >> - >> - General UI changes (gtk2+gtk3 stuff, theme updates, etc) >> - Message Tray >> - section per application names >> Only if something appears as an application in overview mode I'll use >> that (e.g. Disks, Files, Disk Usage Monitor, Image Viewer, etc). The >> internal name (nautilus) to me is meaningless for user bit of the >> release notes. > > I don't object to this approach. I think you have a point. > - Andreas > > -- > marketing-list mailing list > marketing-list@gnome.org > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing-list
That makes sense to me too. From a users' perspective theres no reason to go into details regarding individual packages. Emily -- Whatever you can do, or dream you can, begin it. Boldness has genius, power and magic in it. - Goethe Be who you are and say what you feel because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind. - Dr.Seuss Not everything that can be counted counts, and not everything that counts can be counted. - Albert Einstein -- marketing-list mailing list marketing-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing-list