It depends who we decide as a project needs to approve events and marketing materials. Typically, the PMC is the body that does this. But we might also want to redefine that and say that the community is able to make those approvals.
If we decide that he community can do this without any direct acknowledgement or approval from the PMC, then the dev@ list or the marketing@ list would be fine. And I am sure a few PMC members would see the thread also. But if we are saying that the PMC itself needs to grant approval, then the PMC as a whole needs to be copied in on the thread. Perhaps that is just a CC to private@ with any formal request like this. We could then ask that someone from the PMC acks the request, or we could just allow lazy consensus to apply, and if nobody objects, then it is approved. On 9 April 2013 21:51, Chip Childers <chip.child...@sungard.com> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 09:47:37PM +0100, Noah Slater wrote: > > Just to clarify: I think your proposal looks good. But I don't think > > sending an email to marketing@ constitutes an appropriate approval > > mechanism if the PMC is the body that needs to grant approval. > > Are you proposing that event approvals be done in private (by emailing > private@)? > > I don't agree with the need to do it in private, and since this is a > list that PMC members should/can be on it can act as a perfectly good > (and open) way to do things. > -- NS
