True - would love to see vertical too if they cannot provide a name. It would be good to know that folks from highly regulated environments like government, Financial services & multinationals are using CloudStack. While these circles generally talk with each other, to Ilya's point, they do not like to share publicly what they are doing. A community within a community :)
On 5/30/13 1:32 PM, "Musayev, Ilya" <[email protected]> wrote: >> > I think we *have* to get company name,etc. We need it to know whos >> > responded, to avoid duplicates and also we need to cross match against >> > other,known, users >> >> I disagree. I'm really not in favor of collecting personal data. > >Many big companies wont disclose their use of CS, if we make this part >optional, at least they can give us an idea on the size of the company, >implementation and general industry. >This is better than nothing at all. > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Joe Brockmeier [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2013 1:30 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: cloudstack survey [discuss] >> >> On Thu, May 30, 2013, at 06:26 AM, Giles Sirett wrote: >> > >> > Joe. I really don't think that we're going to get a decent response if >> > this comes from an individual. It needs to come from a known >> > organisation, who will commit to data protection,etc if we're going to >> > get organisations to respond >> >> If it's coming on behalf of ACS, I don't see a problem. >> >> > If we go the route of it officially coming from the community - Who >> > would be able to give clearance to do such a thing ? >> >> I don't think we need any official clearance from higher up in the ASF >>to do >> this as a project. >> >> > >> > I think we *have* to get company name,etc. We need it to know whos >> > responded, to avoid duplicates and also we need to cross match against >> > other,known, users >> >> I disagree. I'm really not in favor of collecting personal data. >> >> Best, >> >> jzb >> -- >> Joe Brockmeier >> [email protected] >> Twitter: @jzb >> http://www.dissociatedpress.net/ > >
