Speaking with no hats on at the moment. I think that this is likely okay. They are noting that it's '$somesoftware FOR CloudStack - there doesn't seem to be any indication that they distribute CloudStack. We'd probably prefer they refer to CloudStack as Apache CloudStack at least once, and perhaps have a link or TM acknowledgement, but I don't think they are blatantly infringing our marks.
--David On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 1:53 PM, Mathias Mullins <[email protected]> wrote: > Ok so before we involve trademarks here, maybe someone can tell me about if > we enforce the trademark usage for Apache CloudStack when people are building > something that works with “CloudStack”? > > Example in point, "WHMCS module for CloudStack” is out there and references > is several times, but never references Apache at all. So is that important? > > http://www.getcloudservices.com/hosting-providers/cloudstack-whmcs-module.html > > Matt
