Do you mean that nobody in Marketing list would be interested to review the docs ?
Could the people in the list please confirm, so my job will be even more easier. -----Original Message----- From: Joe Brockmeier [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2014 10:22 AM To: Radhika Puthiyetath; [email protected] Subject: Re: [CLOUDSTACK-1001] Hyper-V Documentation for Review On 01/21/2014 10:49 PM, Radhika Puthiyetath wrote: > Simple, no time to send three seperate mail...:-) Why send to marketing at all, is my point. It doesn't belong on this list. Sending to all three lists defeats the purpose of having topic-specific lists in the first place - please don't do it. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Joe Brockmeier [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2014 8:50 PM > To: [email protected] > Cc: Radhika Puthiyetath > Subject: Re: [CLOUDSTACK-1001] Hyper-V Documentation for Review > > On Tue, Jan 21, 2014, at 12:17 AM, Radhika Puthiyetath wrote: >> Sorry for cross-posting. > > So... why? :-) > > I don't understand why you'd send this to the marketing list, honestly. > I know that folks want review of documentation, but I don't see why this > particular draft needs to go to marketing. > > Let's please not establish a habit of this - there's a reason we have three > different mailing lists and people choose to subscribe to the lists that are > of interest. If I'm only subscribed to marketing (or user, or dev), that's a > strong signal I don't want dev or user messages clogging my inbox. > >> Hyper-V Documentation draft is ready to be picked up for review. >> >> You can find the latest draft doc at >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1001 >> >> Share your feedback so that we can improve the usability of this new >> feature. >> >> Thanks >> -Radhika > > > Best, > > jzb > -- > Joe Brockmeier > [email protected] > Twitter: @jzb > http://www.dissociatedpress.net/ > -- Joe Brockmeier [email protected] Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
