@chip, there are couple typos in that patch (requestor, requester, requster…) u might want to double check.
At the end it says that the vote will be on private@ ? should that say press@ ? Do we need to explain the process of mark approval in the bylaw. Less is good, so maybe we should just put the actual process in the trademark guidelines and keep the bylaw as short and sweet as possible ? with that said, +1 -sebastien On Jul 14, 2014, at 12:39 PM, Chip Childers <[email protected]> wrote: > Since there don't appear to be any objections, I'm calling a vote for > the attached patch to our project bylaws. > > Please vote: > > [ ] +1 - accept the proposed patch to the project bylaws > [ ] +/-0 - no strong opinion > [ ] -1 - do not accept the proposed patch > > This vote requires a lazy majority of active PMC members, at least 3 +1 > (binding) and more +1 than -1. > <bylaws.patch>
