Thanks, Johs. I proposed this approach during the weekly IRC meeting last week, and the PMC members present agreed. We reviewed the discussion on the PMC mailing list and Robert took the great action of writing it up and formalising it for this list.
Teamwork! -Joan ----- Original Message ----- From: "Johs Ensby" <j...@b2w.com> To: marketing@couchdb.apache.org Sent: Monday, March 23, 2015 7:54:48 PM Subject: Re: [NOTICE] CouchDB logo process & decision Community is fantastic, especially with a healthy dose of leadership Like this:) johs > On 24 Mar 2015, at 00:20, Robert Kowalski <robertkowal...@apache.org> wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > I would like to give you an update regarding the process for the new > logo design. Sorry that it took so long and for the confusion, but we > finally found a way to decide on the logo and move forward regarding > this topic. The process will have three steps: > > > Step 1 - You can still submit proposals and we will also propose the > old CouchDB logo as a possible candidate until April 5 > > > Step 2 - We will then run a public vote for all committers on this > mailing list (marketing@couchdb.apache.org) (see “Non-technical > decision” in our bylaws [1]) by April 20. This vote will inform the > decision made in Step 3. > > > Step 3 - The PMC will vote on a final decision by May 18, which will > take the public vote as significant input. The PMC can decide to go > with the results of the public vote, or make its own choice. > > > [1] http://couchdb.apache.org/bylaws.html#types
