On 10/28/2010 04:21 PM, Drew Jensen wrote: >> Religious organizations are another are where costs and document portability >> might not be a major concern because everyone is using the
Small non-profits tend to have big issues with compatibility, because they typically use old software that is no longer supported. Those microsoft grants are not all that they are cracked up to be. So much so, that even with a grant, the costs involved in complying with the terms of the grant are such, that the organization would be better off refusing the grant. >> same thing so there are no problems > have met many people from small congregations in the forums One of the big hurdles that FLOSS advocates have to face, when trying to migrate religious organizations to FLOSS, is the lack of usable software that is functionally equivalent to their (usually pirated) Windows product. The significant software there is the one that handles membership data, scheduling, sermon preparation, service co-ordination, lyric presentation, and any number of church stuff that nobody but the church secretary, the board of elders, and the pastor know about. jonathon -- No human will see non-list, non-bulk, non-junk email sent to this address. It all gets forwarded to /dev/null -- E-mail to marketing+h...@libreoffice.org for instructions on how to unsubscribe List archives are available at http://www.libreoffice.org/lists/marketing/ All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
