Hi Johannes!

Am Donnerstag, den 17.02.2011, 17:46 +0100 schrieb Johannes Bausch:
> Weird, I thought I'd have subscribed to the design list. Seems as if I have
> cancelled the subscription by accident. And I wondered why noone works on
> this stuff ^^.

:-) Glad to have you back!!!

Cheers,
Christoph


> 2011/2/17 Bernhard Dippold <bernh...@familie-dippold.at>
> 
> > Hi Joey, all!
> >
> > You're totally that we want to go on with the Community Design.
> >
> > But this will happen on the design list, not on marketing.
> >
> > So please: everybody interested in this task: Join our Design Team.
> >
> > The Kick-Off for the Design Team has reached it's third step: Introduction
> > of the Team Members:
> >
> > http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Design/Kick-Off#Step_3:_Introduction_of_the_Team_Members
> >
> > The Community Design is one of the main points in Step 7 - probably to be
> > started in a few weeks, while the steps in-between are necessary to be
> > solved before.
> >
> > CC'ing the design list, so the people there are aware of this mail...
> >
> > Best regards
> >
> > Bernhard
> >
> > (for the design list I keep the full quote)
> >
> >
> > Johannes Bausch schrieb:
> >
> >  Hey folks,
> >>
> >> as far as I have followed the development so far it seems that both logo
> >> and
> >> icons (which make the gross of our branding) for the current release (3.3)
> >> have been used quite extensively and seem to be the ones we will settle on
> >> in the long run. I still want to share some thoughts about that.
> >>
> >> 1. What happened to the community branding? As the current logo has been
> >> used so much, I must say that I want to speak *against* changing it again.
> >> 2. The wiki branding site is still full of ideas for logos, mascots, icons
> >> etc. and it seems as if nothing is decided yet. And this is the official
> >> position, isn't it? Having said that, I'd like to encourage you (us) to
> >> somehow finalize the branding. There are so many great artists (see the
> >> wallpaper renders of the icons) who use, yes, which drafts? - The official
> >> one? The ones they like most? - for their work. I think it would be better
> >> if we had a clear decision regarding branding, and that as soon as
> >> possible.
> >> 3. There is no central place to look for resources (yes, since we haven't
> >> decided upon an official version yet, I begin to repeat myself). The
> >> wallpaper renders, for example, where are the source files for these
> >> icons?
> >> They look like Bernhard's, but even better. *They *should be the ones used
> >> in the application.
> >>
> >> Now some minor issues which I still don't like about the current
> >> "official"
> >> files.
> >> 1. The "LibreOffice" still has no proper ligatures. From a typographic
> >> point
> >> of view the text looks cheap.
> >> 2. There is no proper spacing/connection between logo and logo text:
> >> http://tinyurl.com/6kt8n8q
> >> For me logo and text look like two distinct parts. There are several
> >> reasons
> >> for this. The edges on the logo are rounded while the text has sharp ones.
> >> The lines of text and logo are not the same width.
> >> 3. I don't like the emboss effect on the "contemporary color" version
> >> (while
> >> this might be my personal opinion, I still want you to consider that for a
> >> second. In my eyes it just looks like a cheap gimp filter added to the
> >> normal version).
> >>
> >> As far as I can remember, we thought about starting work on the official
> >> branding after 3.3 is released. I am willing to spend some time on this
> >> issue over the next few months, but only if we can decide upon a goal in
> >> this discussion.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Joey
> >>
> >>
> >
> > --
> > Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to marketing+h...@libreoffice.org
> > List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/marketing/
> > *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
> >
> >
> 



-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to marketing+h...@libreoffice.org
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/marketing/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***

Reply via email to