Hi Dave, I think it's also worth keeping an eye on related pages and making sure the treatment of LibreOffice is fair and balanced. For example, instead of having http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenOffice.org and covering the history of the project and pointing to its successors, the page just redirects to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenOffice - something that to me at least seems to embody a partial point of view. At the very least the talk pages need following and citable sources contributed.
Cheers, S. On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 1:30 AM, Dave Johnson <davefilms...@icloud.com>wrote: > FYI, I have full edit access on Wikipedia. I would be happy to edit the > LibreOffice article. > > Sent from my iPad. > > -- > Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to marketing+h...@global.libreoffice.org > Problems? > http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ > Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette > List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/marketing/ > All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be > deleted > > -- *Simon Phipps* http://webmink.com *Meshed Insights & Knowledge * *Office:* +1 (415) 683-7660 *or* +44 (238) 098 7027 *Mobile*: +44 774 776 2816* * -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to marketing+h...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/marketing/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
