On Dec 15, 2015 03:33, "Gabriele Trombini" <g.tromb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello Remy (and all mktg guys), > > Il giorno mar, 15/12/2015 alle 02.41 -0500, Remy DeCausemaker ha > scritto: > > mktgs, > > > > Across the Project, one of the tools we use to get better at what > > wedo > > is a Retrospective. This is a report compiled by contributors that > > more or less lists the things that went well/not-so-well, and ideas > > for improvement. You can find examples on the wiki (QA has some > > recent > > pages like https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_21_QA_Retrospective > > and https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_21_Retrospective) > > > > Marketing Retrospectives were once based upon SOPs (Standard > > Operating > > Procedures) for doing marketing tasks like creating the > > alpha/beta/final > > announcements, briefing ambassadors, and other interesting and > > crucial > > work. Some are a bit dated, but you can find them here: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Marketing_SOPs > > Yes, that's right, in particular the SOP page for retrospective is [1] > and I would have done the retrospective, but really was busy so I miss > the date, but thank you for heading this up. > As the F23 mktg tasks shows [2], it was due in November. I'm going to > open a mktg ticket for regain the time lost, and work on it soon (in > fact we have a bit of time before before a new F24 task happens). > > > > Since we didn't totally stick to an SOP for releases this year, we're > > just going to gather extra 'after the fact' feedback and data to make > > improvements to our process, going back to Fedora 22 when possible. > > > > Here are a few questions we'd like to take a stab at answering on our > > wiki page: > > > > - What did we do right? > > - What can we do better? > > - Where did we have gaps? > > - How did we bridge them? > > > > After we've gotten this retrospective fleshed out, we'd like to > > reinstate regular mktg meetings on IRC in early 2016. Keep an eye on > > the lists for updates. > > Agreed, I had the same thought. Honestly I'd like to clarify some > questions inside the mktg just like how many of us are working on > magazine and how many on tasks? > I'd like shooting mails to mktg people joined the FAS group asking for > a better engagement along the tasks time. It is not possible the "usual > suspects" are the only members working on. > > > > > If folks have any questions about this email, or additional questions > > they think would provide value to the retrospective, please update > > the > > wiki before Friday 12/18 (or even just respond here, and commops will > > update the wiki from this thread.) > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/2015_marketing_retrospective > > > > We have a mktg page [3] reporting the main links to the pages, it > renews automatically every cycle, so the new pages should be opened > following those red links. > Wiki is really messed up and mktg part probably more than others, and > we should try to get it tidy. > > Thank you very much.
Thank YOU mailga. I checked to see when the last meeting block was, and you were def in the logs on the last entry. Glad to see you're still here too :) Looking Forward, --RemyD. > > Gabri > > > [snip] > > [1]https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Marketing_retrospective_SOP > [2] > https://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-23/f-23-marketing-tasks.html > [3]https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Marketing#Release_deliverables > > > -- > marketing mailing list > marketing@lists.fedoraproject.org > List info or to change your subscription: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing
-- marketing mailing list marketing@lists.fedoraproject.org List info or to change your subscription: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing
