Am 04.01.21 um 17:08 schrieb ddemaio:
looking at what was going on last night on openSUSE's Twitter account
[1] I'd like to know, who has access to the social media accounts of
this community. Indeed there is a list on the wiki but it does not
look complete as @openSUSE is managed via Grouptweet. [2]
I've been on holiday, so I don't have any background of what you're
referring to above.
See my initial email:
[1] https://twitter.com/openSUSE/with_replies
[3] https://twitter.com/TheTechScribe/status/1339927973613416449
Or are we talking past each other?
The wiki doesn't really reflect the true access to
the group account I'm sure. It's probably not a good idea to consolidate
access since the group can delete, correct or provide support. The end
of the year survey had question related to user support. Almost 200
responses stated that their contribution was user support, which would
be forums, emails, facebook, twitter, linkedin, etc.
I don't want to consolidate access rights but know who has them.
The tweets from last night were nothing severe, imho. Yet there was a
slightly irritation about them. That and as conjunction with the
recently bad mouthing on CentOS [3] we need to talk about quality
standards of community representation somehow.
We could come up with some standards. But maybe just reminding everyone
to try relating answers or content with the guiding principles rather
than forming a set of new standards would be the best option. Perhaps?
Right, which is mostly what I intended. There is no need for new
standards as the existing ones pretty much cover everything.
Still we need to know who has access to @openSUSE so we know whom to
remind of what's good to post and what should not be published.
vinz.
