Sean DALY wrote:
> Sebastian, what's your take? Can we "retire" SoaS-{1,2,3} or fold them
> into the public v1, v2 numbers?Okay, let me shed some light in here, though I think this has already been discussed in length. In the early days when I started working on SoaS, we still had internal builds based on Fedora 10 - which were labeled SoaS-1 - but never got actually released. As we proceeded in development, SoaS was rebased on Fedora 11 and since we needed new directories, we just increased this number. This is what became Strawberry (meaning Sugar on a Stick v1) in the end. And it's the explanation for this probably strange situation. It might not be the best solution and we should probably think of ways to fix it (for example on a newly created SoaS mailing list, heh). But I don't think it's something incredibly wrong that will scare all our users away. Most of them will probably not even see the .iso label. Regarding the docs, I agree: the wiki pages are cluttered. They need to be cleaned up before the release (we've a documentation deadline in our roadmap, though)! But this also goes hand in hand with what should be on those pages - and that's something for the "future of SoaS"-thread. --Sebastian _______________________________________________ Marketing mailing list Marketing@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/marketing
