It seems like we have agreement on going 1.0 so far. Unless someone speak up I'm going to make that the plan in a couple of days.
On 17 May 2013 15:07, Daniel Narvaez <dwnarv...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > we need to decide if we want the next release to be 1.0 or 0.100. > > Here is the features we are planning for it. > > * Develop an HTML5 based toolkit for activities > > * Multiple selection in the Journal > http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Multi_selection > > * Enhanced support for 3G modems > http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/3G_Support/Database_Support > > * Background customization > http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Background_image_on_home_view > > * Multiple home views > http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Multiple_home_views > > * Integration with web services > http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Web_services > > * Journal comments box > http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Comment_box_in_journal_detail_view > > * Icon customization > http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Icon_Change > > > It's a bit of weird situation because code wise we are not really 1.0 > ready. We are developing a new toolkit and the old one could use an API > cleanup. On the other hand we are deployed to millions of users. > > Personally I don't really have a strong feeling. If the marketing team > sees an opportunity in a 1.0 in October with the above feature list I'd say > to go ahead with it even if from a developer point of view we are not > ready. Otherwise we could delay it at least another cycle. > > -- > Daniel Narvaez > -- Daniel Narvaez
_______________________________________________ Marketing mailing list Marketing@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/marketing
