On 6 November 2013 17:38, Gonzalo Odiard <gonz...@laptop.org> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 12:53 PM, Daniel Narvaez <dwnarv...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > On 6 November 2013 16:45, Gonzalo Odiard <gonz...@laptop.org> wrote: > >> > >> >> > >> >> In the short term, we don't need backport Webkit2 to F18. > >> > > >> > Please elaborate :) > >> > > >> > I think developing web activities on two very different platforms > >> > (WebKit1 > >> > and WebKit2) is a bad idea, it will involve more work (and pain) then > >> > doing > >> > some backporting. > >> > >> Well, with a little patch in our F18 rpm, I have all the web > >> activities working ok in webkit1. A important missing feature is the > >> web inspector, but they work ok. > > > > > > We never solved the document domain issue right (if I remember correctly > you > > failed to get a in-activity web server running)? > > > > No. the web-server issue is already solved. >
If we want to support WebKit1, I think we should do it upstream then. I'm still not thrilled about that but not opposed to it either.
_______________________________________________ Marketing mailing list Marketing@lists.sugarlabs.org http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/marketing