Finally got the ML to reply to it, seems there was some odd code on
the header generated by the ML that was labeled as SPAM by the
spamassasin.

On 4/6/14, Rob Weir <robw...@apache.org> wrote:
> We play to a score of 11, yes?
>
> -Rob
>
> On Sun, Apr 6, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Fabrizio Bury <fabriziob...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> pong
>>
>>
>> 2014-04-05 18:17 GMT+02:00 simon peter Neves Pedro <
>> simonpeter.nevespe...@gmail.com>:
>>
>>> pong
>>>
>>>
>>> On 5 April 2014 01:45, Alexandro Colorado <j...@oooes.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> > ping
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Alexandro Colorado
>>> > Apache OpenOffice Contributor
>>> > http://www.openoffice.org
>>> >
>>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: marketing-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>>> > For additional commands, e-mail: marketing-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Simon Peter Neves Pedro
>>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: marketing-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: marketing-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>
>


-- 
Alexandro Colorado
Apache OpenOffice Contributor
http://www.openoffice.org

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: marketing-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: marketing-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Reply via email to