I checked some stats file and for me both summary/cycles and ooocore/total/cycles are same. Can you post the diff of your changes? From the code that updates both the counters seems correct.
- Avadh On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 11:24 PM, DRAM Ninjas <[email protected]> wrote: > The summary you mean the print statement at the end of the logfile/std out > when the simulation ends? > > I think Avadh has said that that print is deprecated and the stuff that's > printed isn't necessarily right. > > On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 4:07 PM, Matthew Laquidara <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I'm curious about the cycle counts shown by the marss statistics. I'm >> running with a single core and 1 thread per core I'm getting very >> different cycle counts from summary/cycles vs. ooocore/total/cycles; the >> latter is consistently a little under 5 times the former. Furthermore, the >> former is close to the sum of the cycle counts in the kernel/user >> snapshots whereas the latter is not. >> >> I am wondering if I am misreading/misunderstanding something very >> fundamental or if something else is at work. I have the latest version of >> marss pulled from git and I have made some changes, but I don't see them >> as impacting statistics collection. >> >> Thank you very much. >> -matt >> >> _______________________________________________ >> http://www.marss86.org >> Marss86-Devel mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.cs.binghamton.edu/mailman/listinfo/marss86-devel >> > > > _______________________________________________ > http://www.marss86.org > Marss86-Devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.cs.binghamton.edu/mailman/listinfo/marss86-devel > >
_______________________________________________ http://www.marss86.org Marss86-Devel mailing list [email protected] https://www.cs.binghamton.edu/mailman/listinfo/marss86-devel
