Hi Paul, I am running a single thread application in a 2 core simulated machine using ./start_sim..... The next thing I am going to measure is how much of these kernel requests are due to the start_sim and kill_sim commands.
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 10:26 AM, Paul Rosenfeld <[email protected]>wrote: > That sounds pretty high to me, but it'd be helpful if you provided some > additional details: are you starting simulation from a region of interest > or are you starting from the shell using ./start_script? how many cores are > you simulating? Is the workload multi-threaded? > > > On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 7:01 PM, Mansour Shafaei Moghaddam < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I have got a log from the memory requests arrived to the memory >> controller and the results reveal that the majority of requests (around 80% >> in my benchmark) are initiated by kernel. I have two questions regarding >> that and I really appreciate if you could share your opinions about them: >> >> 1) Does this number sound rational or not? >> 2) Are all of the benchmark's memory requests included in the non-Kernel >> requests? Can we say that all of the non-Kernel requests are exclusively >> originated from the benchmark? >> >> P.S. I know that this percentage may be different depending on the >> application I run. >> >> Thanks in advance >> >> _______________________________________________ >> http://www.marss86.org >> Marss86-Devel mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.cs.binghamton.edu/mailman/listinfo/marss86-devel >> >> >
_______________________________________________ http://www.marss86.org Marss86-Devel mailing list [email protected] https://www.cs.binghamton.edu/mailman/listinfo/marss86-devel
