Then where the difference between cycle number of different cores comes from? Alireza
Sent from my iPhone On May 1, 2014, at 6:39 AM, Paul Rosenfeld <[email protected]> wrote: I believe it's fairly difficult to distinguish what it means to be "active". I don't believe marss models dvfs, so there's always something using a core -- even if it is the idle thread that is doing nothing. On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 4:53 PM, alireza nazari <[email protected]>wrote: > Hello, > > I am confused about some stats. I want to know how many cycles a benchmark > takes to execute in parallel. Does " ooo_x_x : cycle:xxxxxxxx " show all > the cycles that a specific core is active or it just counts all the sim > cycles regardless of if the core is used or not? I assume that when a part > of application is sequential, one core is used and the rest are idle, this > means one of the cores should have a larger cycle than the rest. I do not > see that in the benchmark that I am running now. Am I wrong? how can I find > the number of cycles a core was active and for how many cycles it was > idle(not waiting for dependency but actual idle because of no instruction > to execute) > > Thank you > Alireza > > > > _______________________________________________ > http://www.marss86.org > Marss86-Devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.cs.binghamton.edu/mailman/listinfo/marss86-devel > >
_______________________________________________ http://www.marss86.org Marss86-Devel mailing list [email protected] https://www.cs.binghamton.edu/mailman/listinfo/marss86-devel
