Hi, 1) As I know, in emulated mode, MARSS uses QEMU. 2) I think it depends on whether the microarchitectural features heavily affects your result or not.
Thanks, Hanhwi > 2015. 3. 30., 오전 7:36, karthik vm <[email protected]> 작성: > > Hi, > > I am trying to use MARSS for my research work on lock contention > issues on parallel programs running on future many-core processors. > When I tried to compile MARSS for 32 cores and run my parallel > programs, I find it to take a lot of time. But when I just emulate > (using the default QEMU available) instead of switching to simulation, > obviously I could run my parallel programs faster and could simulate > the lock contentions. I have few questions from these observations for > which I look for clarifications: > > 1) When the MARSS is running in emulated mode is it just another QEMU? > or is there any difference? > 2) Since I am able to reproduce my lock contention problem using > emulation(& the simulator being too slow for large core counts) I am > thinking of working with it to test my algorithms. Will the research > community accept the results obtained from an emulator? Kindly let me > know. > > Thanks for your time, > karthik > > _______________________________________________ > http://www.marss86.org > Marss86-Devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.cs.binghamton.edu/mailman/listinfo/marss86-devel > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ http://www.marss86.org Marss86-Devel mailing list [email protected] https://www.cs.binghamton.edu/mailman/listinfo/marss86-devel
