Bob Malecki wrote: >>You mean we're in a pre-revolutioanry situation now? So the alleged rise of >>Nazis, from London to Littleton, is somehow a response to this? How do you >>know? >> >>Doug >> >What? > >Bob Sure sounded to me like you were arguing that the Nazis were a serious political threat, and by your own definition, the ruling class used Nazis to fight a pre-revolutionary situation. So I was wondering if you were implying that this is indeed a pre-revolutionary situation, a claim so curious I'd like to hear more. But maybe you don't believe that. So please clarify. Doug --- from list [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---
- SV: M-TH: Re: Jim's times letter on fascism... Bob Malecki
- Re: SV: M-TH: Re: Jim's times letter on fascism... Doug Henwood
- SV: M-TH: Re: Jim's times letter on fascism... Bob Malecki
- SV: SV: M-TH: Re: Jim's times letter on fascism... Bob Malecki
- M-TH: Re: Jim's times letter on fascism... Rob Schaap
- SV: M-TH: Re: Jim's times letter on fascism... Bob Malecki
- SV: SV: SV: M-TH: Re: Jim's times letter on fascism... Bob Malecki
- M-TH: Revolutionary situations? -- Never heard of ... Hugh Rodwell
- Re: M-TH: Revolutionary situations? -- Never h... Doug Henwood
- SV: SV: SV: M-TH: Re: Jim's times letter on fascism... Bob Malecki
- M-TH: Re: Jim's times letter on fascism... Doug Henwood
- M-TH: Jim's Times article on fascism... Jim heartfield
- SV: M-TH: Re: Jim's times letter on fascism... Bob Malecki