I only quickly skimmed your paper, but certain sections in the review of
the literature seem too sketchy (e.g. the short paragraph on "economistic
approaches"). For early original sources by mainstream (neo-classical)
economists, see A.N. Argawala and S.P. Singh ed. _The Economics of
Development_ (Delhi, Oxford University Press, 1958). I would also
recommend that you read Ronald L. Chilcote _Theories of Development and
Underdevelopment_ (Boulder, Westview Press, 1984) for a comprehensive
review of the radical literature.
Jerry
--- from list [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---
