On Fri, 20 May 2005 20:52:44 -0000 "redtwister666" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > This is more by way of a response to the distortion of both Mach and > materialism, for which I turn to Pannekoek, who was versed in > Marxism > and a practicing astronomer and scientist. IMO, Lenin's work is not > only bad Marxism, but ignores that Mach did correctly argue against > certain scientific theories of his day (the post-1875 Europe), about > which Lenin seems to know very little. > > http://www.geocities.com/~johngray/lenphl07.htm
Karl Korsch wrote a response to Pannekoek in his *Lenin as Philosopher*. See: http://www.marxists.org/archive/korsch/1938/lenin-philosophy.htm Jim F. _______________________________________________ Marxism-Thaxis mailing list Marxism-Thaxis@lists.econ.utah.edu To change your options or unsubscribe go to: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism-thaxis
