Homo sapiens today suffers from species snobbery or a related infection. 
This is why it devotes so much energy to the issue of the discovery of alien 
forms of intelligent life. It is as if the discovery of alien intelligent 
life forms is something to be sought after more than other life forms or 
even forms of nature.
The point is that it is not necessarily a matter of significance to find 
life on a par with our intelligence or not. It may be  just as great a 
scientific achievement to find life forms whether in the form of intelligent 
or non-intelligent forms. Scientifically and philosophically there cannot be 
a difference. The only basis from which there can be a difference is in 
terms of exploitation or companionship. Scientifically neither forms matter. 
Finding non-intelligent life maybe just as scientifically significant if not 
more since the scope for greater scientific development may be muich greater 
than when as otherwise.
It just makes no sense scientifically as to why it is more important to 
discover intelligent life forms than other life forms or even non-living 
forms of nature. To privilege one over the other is to be both unobjective 
and ideological. This is then a philosophical and not a scientific postion. 
We then need to understand the philosophical basis underlying this outlook. 
Scientifically homo sapiens nor other intelligent life forms, supposing they 
exist, can merit no more attention than other natural phenomena. Indeed the 
view that homo sapiens and any other intelligent life forms merit special 
attention by science contains a form of speciasm. It suggests that 
scientifically speaking this caegory is at the centre of being and is what 
really matters. But given the nature of science this cannot be a scientific 
position but a philosophical one. And if this position is one that much of 
the scientific community has adopted then it has to be said that science is 
being dominated and restricted by a particular philosophy. This means that 
scientific inquiry is not motivating science but a particular philosophy. 
But science cannot be determined by a particular prejudice, a particular 
philosophy, but by science itself. Such a situation can distort the 
scientific enterprise and even obstruct its progress.

Paddy Hackett 



_______________________________________________
Marxism-Thaxis mailing list
Marxism-Thaxis@lists.econ.utah.edu
To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism-thaxis

Reply via email to