My review is part of a much larger project, which has to do with te relation
of logic and reality, and beyond that, the fragmentation of knowledge under
conditions of alienation. That would be the "marxist" angle that iunterests
me, rather than advocacy of 'Marxism' per se.  Graham Priest is far more
interesting than Sean Sayers was at the time of the debate in question.  But
let's review the logic of my intervention.
 
^^^^
CB: Good to see some statements of your larger project.

What is the difference between paraconsistent logic and dialectics or
aspects of dialectics. I welcome paraconsistent logic efforts as steps by
formal logicians to develop dialectical logic more in formal logical
"terms", if that is what paraconsistent logical thinking is.

^^^^^

Priest's book (1995, 2002) BEYOND THE LIMITS OF THOUGHT doesn't mention Marx
or Marxism, though Hegel emerges as the hero of the book.  We also know from
Priest's earlier two essays in SCIENCE & SOCIETY that he is a Marxist or has
a keen interest in Marxism.  Furthermore, he is one of those rare
individuals in the English-speaking world with an interest in both
dialectics and formal logic.  So it is important to see how he seeks to
unite the two.  But oddly--and this part of my larger purview--he doesn't
seem to have a whoe lot to say about dialectics (or about the vcarious
philosophies he treats later) except to make his one big pitch for
paraconsistent logic which offers a formalism for incorporating
contradictions.  But what good is this formalism in terms of modeling
reality in a substantive fashion?  I can't tell.  And this, it seems to me,
Priest merely reproduces the conditions of alienated theoretical labor and
fails to overcome fragmentation and to unify an understanding of how logic
relates to other philosophical issues and to objective reality itself.  His
grasp of formal logic should make him far more sophisticated than the
dialectical materialists of old, but he seems bent on making the same
trivial points.

^^^^^
CB: There is this paradox that both formal logic , in say the identity
principle, and dialectics, in elementary processes, have trivial aspects.




_______________________________________________
Marxism-Thaxis mailing list
[email protected]
To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism-thaxis

Reply via email to