Like I said before, I don´t have the time to sit in front of this computer 
neither the economic resources for sitting here and have a debate about "my" 
historical interpretation of the counterrevolutionary process that led us to 
this particular situation.  Anyway, I want to say or repeat what I said before: 
centralized all revolutionary forces in order to generalize our action.  If we 
don´t open a revolutionary process in order to combine surprise attack with a 
nationwide insurrection, we´ll have to see the US invading many other 
countries. 


[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: WL: -clip-
I defined what I mean by revolution as a process 
that is taking place in front of us. 

WL: Revolutions do not overthrow a civic power. That is called the act of 
insurrection. What the revolution in the means of production do is sublate 
one 
form and quality of the organization of the material power of production. 

See the difference in approach. 


^^^^
CB: This has the appearance of wishful thinking or something. Not too many
people would call what is going on in front of us a revolutionary process.
To call what is going on in front of us in the USA a revolution seems like a
form of American exceptionalism, speaking of American exceptionalism. This
shit is not revolution.

***************

American Exceptionalism 

WL: This is really not a narrow subjective question but one that has been 
written about continuously since the 1980 publication of Alvin Toffler's "Third 
Wave." Some of these revolutionary changes were alluded to in his 1970s book 
"Future Shock." 

The revolution is not the insurrectionary movement that crowns the 
revolutionary movement in the economic structure of society. 

By "American exceptionalism" I do not mean what one might carry a bad 
political projection or a mis articulation of a general Marxist concept. 
American 
exceptionalism is the theory that America is an exception to Marxist economic 
and 
social laws. This "theory" was introduced by Jay Lovestone as General 
Secretary of the CPUSA, by Earl Browder as General Secretary of the CPUSA and 
by 
William Z. Foster as Chairman of the CPUSA.. 

Apparently in the case of Lovestone and Browder, the "material basis" for 
this theory was the fact that the economic cyclical crisis of bourgeois 
production, in America, was not as sever, wide spread or lengthy as in Europe. 
The 
general expansion of our Western frontier tended to mitigate the crisis with 
millions of ruined folks moving westward and we have a very large country that 
was 
at difference level of economic development. The crash of 1929 would seem to 
disprove this theory, but the expansion going into World War 2 provided our 
country with an impetus for industrial expansion. 

The temporary alliance between Soviet Power and bourgeois America sowed many 
illusions about the class struggle. Right off the bat I forget the name of the 
CPUSA leader who wrote "Teheran and After" which basically wreck parties like 
the Philippine Communist Party by spreading the illusion that a new era had 
opened in which communists could relay upon the bourgeoisie. 

American exceptionalism is a distinct body of ideology and politics peculiar 
to the evolution of the CPUSA. Besides being a syndicalist, William Z. 
Foster's contribution to American exceptionalism was him importing into Marxism 
and 
the National Question, the concept of a "nation within a nation" rather than 
the Marxist concept of the Stalin and Lenin pole, of various nations and 
national groups within a multinational state system. 

Here I should mention that even Leon Trotsky had harsh words towards the 
American Trotskyists concerning the national question and their approach to the 
Negro People. 

Now in the case of Foster all he basically did was borrowed an old concept 
form Martin Delaney - father of Black Nationalism in America. Dr. James Jackson 
- Negro psychopath of the CPUSA, borrowed from Foster his concept of African 
Americans as a nation within a nation and then declared that migration had 
destroyed the nation that the African Americans never constituted. On this 
basic a 
Marxist conception of the National Factor in respects to the African American 
people was abolished and replaced by the non Marxist concept that the 
national question in America was a question of race antagonism. This is how 
American 
exceptionalism operated in our history. 

I know this history from study. 

Being wrong is not the meaning of American exceptionalism and its various 
bodies of politics. In the case of the African American National Factor our 
history has mitigated against an understanding of the South as providing all 
the 
economic, politics and social and cultural centers of gravity up until the 
Civil 
War. The National Question emerged on this basis and the new nation formed on 
American soil was in fact in the North. 

The African American people are not a nation, were never a nation and will 
not ever be a nation and it was US - me and mutherfuckers like me, generated on 
the basis of Watts 1965 and Detroit 1967 that reformulated the Marxist 
approach to the Negro Question. We are not a nation and have never been a 
nation. 

You and I argue this same point on Pen-L when you repeated verbatim Dr, 
Jackson's Thesis concerning the dispersal of the African American people. The 
entire discussion is in the archives of Pen-L. I can love you and not agree 
with 
you and unravel your history as one who passed through the CPUSA. I do not hate 
the CPUSA but really understand its history. I grew up in the CPUSA bookstores 
and visiting Debs Hall in Detroit - the SWP meeting place where a couple of 
comrade were shoot in the 1960s. 

The Northern working class was formed from European immigrants as opposed to 
the destruction of the country side as in Europe and these immigrant workers, 
cherishing liberty and democracy simply had no understanding of the Negro 
Question other than what Lenin had wrote. I do not hold this against our class. 

No, my approach is not American exceptionalism, which Comrade Stalin wrote 
about. Let's assume that I am wrong. It is not because of or due to American 
excpetionalism which is a distinct and coherent political thread in our 
history. 

Perhaps, this is another items to be added to my political plate of things to 
write about. The current form of American exceptionalism in the CP is simply 
disgusting. A hodge podge of syndicalism from Foster - "class struggle 
politics," mixed with race theory as the national question and a total denial 
of the 
South as the economic and political genesis of America. Then there is this 
conception of the best paid workers as the revolutionary cutting edge in the 
class struggle, with the concept of class struggle defined as any struggle 
between 
worker and capitalist. 

Comrade Charles, I fought for and won my own emancipation of thought and have 
spent a life time trying to refine Marxism into a militant doctrine of combat 
applicable to America. I have had to fight with my own family members in the 
most personal sense because we all emerged as various leaders in the 
industrial conflict. This includes my own flesh and blood brother who is the 
most 
authoritative and knowledgeable International Staff rep in the UAW. 

No one could give me emancipation of thought and I never forget whose back I 
stand on. I stand on the back of heroic Slavic workers who pioneered the path 
for the unskilled, which I continue to travel. 

My approach is very different from that that is the legacy of the CPUSA. 

Comrade Charles you have and are a living witness to some this history. What 
happened in the CPUSAS during the late 1980s and what was the struggle about 
concerning blacks and leadership in the early 1990s? Did this not involve 
Charlene Mitchell? 

Did I ever mention and write about the work with Charlene Mitchell and Angela 
Davis in Gainesville Georgia in 1982? I was there and at the time was living 
in Atlanta Georgia. I sent her and Angela my photos of their Court case. 

Brother man . . . my shit flat out communism and rock hard Marxism. Did I 
ever write about them niggas in Atlanta and their mulatto aristocracy? I was 
fucking their before the movement of entertainers and shit into Atlanta. This 
was 
back when fucking James Baldwin hit the sense to do his book on the Atlanta 
Child Murders and shit. I wrote a series of articles on this shit and Baldwin's 
book - The Evidence of Things Not Seen, made me want to cut both my fucking 
wrist. 

Baldwin was the best of us. 

My shit real. And little by little will be made into a testimony. 

Your brother who you are pissed the fuck off with for calling your shit warm
ed over chauvinism. 

Fuck it. We can still go to the motel. 

Hey . . .l the bourgeoisie and the proletariat overthrow the feudal system as 
its antithetical agents. This means that the serfs could not and became 
political and military reserves of the bourgeoisie and workers. This is how our 
pole articulate the politics of an era. 

Waistline. 

_______________________________________________
Marxism-Thaxis mailing list
[email protected]
To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism-thaxis



__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 
_______________________________________________
Marxism-Thaxis mailing list
[email protected]
To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism-thaxis

Reply via email to