2) CB: "Then there's the problem that reality does contain contradictions. So,science ought to reflect this fact."
RL: Now that is an a priori assumption you do not justify. CB: No, it is _a posteriori_. It is based on the experience of past generations and on my own individual experience. Also, it is not an assumption. It is a _presumption_, analogous to the legal usage of "presumption". It is an _a posteriori_ presumption, i.e. a presumption justified by social and individual experience. See archives of this list for my debating this issue. I'll dig it up for you . Main point is you're "_a priori_ assumption" usage, is an exactly wrong characterization of what I said. Your semantics are exactly wrong. _______________________________________________ Marxism-Thaxis mailing list [email protected] To change your options or unsubscribe go to: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism-thaxis
