>>Today in downtown Los Angeles, over 1 million people   demonstrated in 
support of immigrant rights. This was the largest  demonstration  in the 
history 
of California. March organizers announced  from the stage that the  crowd was 
over 1 million. Univision and other  Spanish-language television  reported that 
up to 2 million people marched.  The Los Angeles Times, reflecting  police 
estimates, gave the march 500,000  - police estimates have been trying to  
minimize pro-immigrant rights  demonstration for the last few weeks.  <<< 
 
Comment 
 
Here is the face of the American Revolution. 
 
This march seems to surpass  the Million Man March and is a new  juncture in 
American history. Classical Marxists calls such movement as these  racial 
movements, outside their concept of the proletarian revolution.   Some of us 
have 
been preparing for such movements and events as long ago as  30 years ago and 
this is the honest to God  truth. 
 
Since Mexico is a very large country with a unique revolutionary  history and 
tradition, their immigrants have played a different role in the  shaping of 
our political life. 
 
I have had it with what is called classical Marxism in America and the  
advanced countries or imperial centers. 
 
In an unprovoked aggression, the US took Texas, New Mexico, Arizona,  
California, Nevada, half of Mexico's national territory, although the most  
imperialist of the bourgeois ideologues claim that Mexican troops crossed the  
Rio 
Grande and attacked a unit of American soldiers, when everyone familiar with  
events knows that Polk ordered troops into Mexico when she refused American  
offers to purchase her territory. The date was January 13, 1846. On May 13, 
1846  
Congress declared war on Mexico. 
 
Without this territory the US of yesteryear would be facing Europe and  
inevitably have come under its control. Further the mechanic of Southern 
slavery  
demanded land acquisition and soil rotation as the basis of human labor intense 
 slave agriculture. At the peace treaty a defeated Mexico accepted the US 
promise  to maintain open borders forever. 
 
That's right . . . open borders forever. 
 
The first great test of the open border doctrine came with the Civil War in  
the United States. When Lincoln spoke of the "last best hope for mankind" he  
was  referring to the fact that political reaction was sweeping and had  
conquered  Europe. The ruling classes of virtually all of these countries  
supported the  Confederacy. Protected by French arms, war material poured  from 
Europe 
into Mexico and from there into the Confederacy in exchange for  cotton. If 
the Mexican national army under Juarez had been defeated, it was very  probable 
that  France and probably England would have declared war on the  US and 
invaded from  Mexico. 
 
Although hard pressed, Lincoln transferred gold and arms to Juarez who  
finally defeated the French and along with the Federal campaign in Texas,  shut 
 
off the flow of arms to the Confederacy through Mexico. 
 
Ever heard of Cinco De Mayo?  That is what is being celebrated. 
 
Cinco De Mayo - the Mexican National Holiday, celebrates their victory over  
the French at Puebla in 1862 and should be celebrated by all Americans. 
 
Here is the political and moral grounds for open borders. 
 
Further, there  are political agreements between governments and  historical 
agreements far to often ignored and not explained to the peoples of  America. 
This complex history is why George W. as a border state governor -  Texas, can 
appear as less fascist  than many of his Democratic sectarian  opposition. 
 
Anyone that looked at some maps of the South and America between 1820 and  
1860 and chart cotton production during these 40 years, will immediately  
understand our history. What is today Arkansas was Indian territory and what is 
 
Kansas was "unorganized territory" or Indian country. The issue becomes still  
more complex because Indians should never under any circumstance be required 
to  carry passports and other such documents in their travel across the depth 
and  breath of their historic territory. 
 
In every theater of the historical Marxist movement associated with Lenin,  
such issues as these are called the National Question or the National Factor  
except in America, where such is called racial antagonism or a race question. 
 
Well . . . we have come full circle and in fact are looking at the face of  
the proletarian revolution in America. 
 
The Chickens have come home to roost. 
 
When the revolutionaries in the United States call for international unity  
and all kinds of uniting the working class world wide, their best support would 
 be to engage in the revolution where they are. Yet CB and his those like him 
 hoist the flag of the imperialist bourgeoisie and call for American jobs for 
 American workers under the guise of advocating building new plants so the 
laid  off workers can have jobs. 
 
In the real world only the Mexican workers - nationals and national  
minority, can politically and physically connect the mass of Anglo American  
workers 
with the on going  Central and South American revolution. Los  Angels is not a 
Mexican or Chicano  Movement as such, but how the  revolutionary process is 
unfolding in America in real time. 
 
The historical junctures were Los Angels 1992 and before that Watts (Los  
Angeles) 1965 and the classical Marxists and ideological communist movement is  
incapable of understanding these events because they become no more  than  
ideological chauvinists hiding behind the ideology of the industrial   
proletariat: meaning the most economically secure white workers. "Whose  hands  
are on 
the basic means of production," "Concentrated in industry"  and "the  poverty 
stricken workers have to many social problems." 
 
Beneath this much talked about industrial proletariat - as it decays in  
front of our eyes, is the real proletarian masses who refuse to be ignored. 
 
Damn right . . . . Mr. Lawyer, the poverty stricken workers have social  
problems  . . . like where the next meal comes from and how can I sell my  
labor 
power. Its not like these poverty stricken workers have more drug problems  for 
instance than working America. Social problems means economic problems to  
me. I understand what they probably me to you with your white middle class  
vision of proletarian revolution. 
 
What an Uncle Tom Marxist. 
 
No power on earth can break the centuries connections between the Mexican  
workers on both sides of our borders. 
 
At any rate the Mexican workers, in their relentless pursuit of work have  
transformed Americas political landscape for all time. 
 
There is no blueprint for our path forward but there are lessons buried in  
our history. 
 

Melvin P.

_______________________________________________
Marxism-Thaxis mailing list
[email protected]
To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism-thaxis

Reply via email to