The history of all hitherto existing society(2) is the history of class  
struggles. 
 
Freeman and slave, patrician and plebeian, lord and serf, guild-master(3)  
and journeyman, in a word, oppressor and oppressed, stood in constant 
opposition 
 to one another, carried on an uninterrupted, now hidden, now open fight, a 
fight  that each time ended, either in a revolutionary reconstitution of 
society at  large, or in the common ruin of the contending classes. 
 
In the earlier epochs of history, we find almost everywhere a complicated  
arrangement of society into various orders, a manifold gradation of social 
rank. 
 In ancient Rome we have patricians, knights, plebeians, slaves; in the 
Middle  Ages, feudal lords, vassals, guild-masters, journeymen, apprentices, 
serfs; 
in  almost all of these classes, again, subordinate gradations. 
 
_http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1848/communist-manifesto/ch01.htm#
a2_ 
(http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1848/communist-manifesto/ch01.htm#a2)
  
 

2. That is, all written history. In 1847, the pre-history of society,  the 
social organisation existing previous to recorded history, all but unknown.  
Since then, August von Haxthausen (1792-1866) discovered common ownership of  
land in Russia, Georg Ludwig von Maurer proved it to be the social foundation  
from which all Teutonic races started in history, and, by and by, village  
communities were found to be, or to have been, the primitive form of society  
everywhere from India to Ireland. The inner organisation of this primitive  
communistic society was laid bare, in its typical form, by Lewis Henry Morgan's 
 
(1818-1861) crowning discovery of the true nature of the gens and its relation  
to 
the tribe. With the dissolution of the primeval communities, society begins  
to be differentiated into separate and finally antagonistic classes. I have  
attempted to retrace this dissolution in The Origin of the Family, Private  
Property, and the State, second edition, Stuttgart, 1886. [Engels, 1888 English 
 
Edition and 1890 German Edition (with the last sentence omitted)] 
 
_http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1848/communist-manifesto/ch01.htm#
a2_ 
(http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1848/communist-manifesto/ch01.htm#a2)
  
 

MP: Engels footnote would alter the lead sentence to read: 
 
"The written history of all hitherto existing society(2) is the history of  
class struggles." 
 
Charles ask: (CB)  "Why is it that "the written history of all  hitherto 
existing society is the history of class struggles " ?" 
 
Engels answer the question Charles ask and explains why he modified the  lead 
sentence in the first place in footnote two.
 
Here is Charles answer that explains why: "The written history of all  
hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles." 


>>>CB: Answer: Because human life, like all plant and animal life  must 
fulfill biological needs to exist as life at all. Marx and Engels are  looking 
for 
_necessity_  to put historical materialism on a scientific  basis. In human 
biology there is necessity, things that must be done.  <<<<
 
 
Charles really makes no sense and is in need of a collective consensus  and 
collective study. He makes no sense what so ever, but believes that what he  
writes make sense. 
 
Charles has dug himself into a hole and refuses to listen to anyone.  What he 
has written above is simply ridiculous. 
 
 
Melvin P. 
 

_______________________________________________
Marxism-Thaxis mailing list
[email protected]
To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism-thaxis

Reply via email to