Richard Fidler 

 [Ottawa Citizen, April 5, 2006, page A1]

 

BY RANDY BOSWELL 

 

  A clash between McGill University and the key federal
agency that funds social science research in the country is
sparking a scholarly debate about the theory of evolution. 

   The university is urging the Ottawa-based Social Sciences
and Humanities Research Council to reconsider its rejection
of a funding bid from prominent McGill professor Brian
Alters, who claims he was turned down on the basis that his
proposed study assumed evolution to be a scientific fact. 

   Mr. Alters, director of McGill's Evolution Education
Research Centre, had requested $40,000 from the research
council to examine how the rising popularity in the U.S. of
"intelligent design" - a controversial creationist theory of
life - is eroding acceptance of evolutionary science in
Canada. 

   The planned project, submitted last year to the research
council, is titled: "Detrimental effects of popularizing
antievolution's intelligent design theory on Canadian
students, teachers, parents, administrators and
policymakers." 

   In denying his request, the research council's
peer-review committee recently sent Mr. Alters a letter
explaining he'd failed to "substantiate the premise" of his
study. 

   It said he hadn't provided "adequate justification for
the assumption in the proposal that the theory of evolution,
and not intelligent-design theory, was correct." 

   Mr. Alters said yesterday that he was "shocked" at the
council's response and it offers "ironic" proof that his
premise about intelligent design gaining a foothold in
Canada is correct. 

   He said he read the letter at a public lecture last week
in Montreal and there were "audible gasps" from the
audience. 

   "Evolution is not an assumption, and intelligent design
is pseudo-science," said Mr. Alters. "I think SSHRC should
come out and state that evolution is a scientific fact and
that intelligent design is not." 

   Jennifer Robinson, McGill's associate vice-principal of
communications, said "intelligent design is a form of
religious belief" and evolution is "well-established
science" beyond serious questioning. 

   "For the committee to say there was inadequate
justification for that assumption - in our view, that's an
incorrect statement," said Mr. Robinson. "We're asking for
them to review their decision." 

   Janet Halliwell, the research council's executive
vice-president and a chemist by training, acknowledged
yesterday that the "framing" of the committee's comments to
Mr. Alters left the letter "open to misinterpretation." 

   Ms. Halliwell said confidentiality obligations made it
difficult for her to discuss Mr. Alters' case in detail, but
argued the professor had taken one line in the letter "out
of context" and the rejection of his application shouldn't
indicate they were expressing "doubts about the theory of
evolution." 

   However, Ms. Halliwell added there are phenomena that
"may not be easily explained by current theories of
evolution," and the scientific world's understanding of life
"is not static. There's an evolution in the theory of
evolution." 

   Intelligent design - the idea that life on Earth was
shaped by the guiding actions of some intelligent force
rather than through natural selection - has become the
latest battleground, particularly in the U.S., between
creationists and advocates of the theory of evolution
championed by famed 19th-century British scientist Charles
Darwin. 

   Mr. Alters recently appeared as an expert witness in a
U.S. court battle over a Pennsylvania school board's
decision to begin teaching intelligent design theory to its
students. 

   The high-profile case had ignited debate in the U.S.
about the primacy of Darwin's theory in American society and
the place of religion in schools. A federal judge ruled on
the case in December, stating intelligent design advanced "a
particular version of Christianity" and couldn't be taught
in classrooms without violating the U.S. constitution. 

 

 


_______________________________________________
Marxism-Thaxis mailing list
[email protected]
To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism-thaxis

Reply via email to