Conclusions
 
What conclusions, then, can be made? First, if we look back  at the  
revolution from a cultural perspective we can see that it evolved   according 
to the 
following pattern: the socialist revolution created the  premise  for the 
emergence of a type of culture which was able to  overcome previous  
relations of 
alienation. We need to understand, of  course, that this was not the  only 
tendency 
of Soviet culture, but it  was more than adequately manifested in  its 
essence. 
And in this sense,  ideal communism -the world of non-alienated  relations - 
in Soviet  society was created in the bosom of Soviet culture and  especially 
in  
its heart and soul (Soviet art); and this is why even today  apologists  for 
the Yeltsin regime continue to strive after Soviet art forms. In   such 
circumstances this was the condition for the appraisal of the laws  of  
Soviet culture, 
which the majority of the working class accepted as  a kind of  prototype of 
communism - i.e. non-alienated social  relations; a situation  already then 
of 
real socialism, which was then  murdered by bureaucratism.

Here it is important to bring to light  another contradiction: the creation  
of this ideal communism in the  realm of Soviet culture appeared not only in  
advance of, but in  isolation of, any manifestation of real socialist 
relations  
in the  material (economic) realm of life, which was still conditioned by a  
very  backward form of capitalism. The success of the former was not in  
itself  
sufficient to overcome the deficiencies of the latter. Indeed,  quite the  
opposite. We also have to be clear, however, that in terms  of what has 
happened  
since 1991, we have not so much moved forwards to  a new stage of capitalism, 
but 
instead we have gone backwards to an almost  unique postmodern form of  
feudalism.

Second, and  following on from this, the liberating potential of culture is  
firmly  connected with the liberating potential of socialist revolutionary   
politics. That is to say, it was the revolution which itself revealed the  
most  
essential laws of culture, which were fully embodied in the  practice of 
social  
transformation and social creativity. Outside of  this domain, the potential 
of 
culture is nearly always restricted to little  more than an act of  
consumption.

Third, the revolution  engendered a new universalism in the form of Soviet  
culture, which  overcame, in an organic way, not only national, but also 
state  
forms  of culture, putting in its place a small niche of world, international 
  
culture. Up to this time world culture had consisted of a dialogue of  
different 
national and popular/folk cultures, but the new Soviet culture  represented a 
new  precedent of world culture based on a completely  different set of 
foundational  principles. That is to say, it emerged  as a result of the 
historical 
and  localised experience of different  peoples, consciously desirous of 
creating a  world of non-alienated  relations.

Fourth, and finally, the general humanistic ideal of a  socially just and  
non-alienated society, which prior to the revolution  existed purely as a 
kind of  
abstract desire, became not just die main  component of Soviet culture (and 
here  we are referring first and  foremost to its socialist tendencies), but 
it 
also  entered the  mentality (the psychological and the spiritual culture) of 
the  people.  This is one of the main reasons why we can still say that even 
in   
today's Russia, while outwardly and perhaps intellectually the rhetoric  of  
anti-communism prevails, inwardly (under their skin) there is still  a great 
deal 
of residual commitment and belief in die values of social  justice, mutual  
assistance and collectivism in ordinary people's  approaches to the 
transition  
now taking place. This residue of  communist cultural values is not 
sufficient 
in  itself to defeat or  block die transition currently under way, but it 
does 
at  least help  explain some of die deformations in that transition process 
and 
why   the process of capitalisation has been far more problematical, as well 
as  more  vicious, in Russia than elsewhere.

If, then, in October  1917 the Bolshevik revolution created culture as  
communism, we should  assert tliat our future task is to create, in die words 
of  
Karl  Liebknecht, 'communism as  culture'.

http://www.alternativy.ru/en/node/84

_______________________________________________
Marxism-Thaxis mailing list
[email protected]
To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism-thaxis

Reply via email to