> ^^^^^^ > CB; Yes, I saw your response. Don't have to respond to everything everybody > says, do we ? Your more expansive response gets the last say. You must be > right (smile).
Well, we know what 'right' is on the internet, don't we? If you can get a list where about 5 people post and if they can effectively form a bully gang for a couple days and censor others, then they have found what is 'right'. Right? > CB: I'm thinking you have the liberal position in relation to the "China and > Decline of US Imperialism" piece. Discouraging left discussion of > imperialist crisis is liberal, not radical. Wait let me get this straight. I am attempting to discuss why this is not the crisis you are looking for, so aren't we discussing it? Second, who is discussing a liberal position here? I mean, on A particular list that you seem to be citing in your own inimical way--another restless transcendental spirit that is NOT--on that particular list, Chalmers Johnson, Al Gore and Patrick Cockburn are considered serious thinkers. I think two don't even qualify as liberals. I guess you must bored with reading them there and so are trying to do something with that stuff on this list. Fine, who am I to say that isn't a real liberal spirit on display? I would never attempt to censor you. And in attempting to discuss 'China as a foil to US imperialism', I apparently am discouraging you from discussing. Guess we never would get along in philosophy class. So go ahead discuss. CJ _______________________________________________ Marxism-Thaxis mailing list [email protected] To change your options or unsubscribe go to: http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism-thaxis
